Re: [SR-Users] mistakenly detected NAT in IPv6 setup

2015-01-23 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi Daniel, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > can you split your checks from nat_uac_test("23") to individual checks > (like nat_uac_test("1"), nat_uac_test("2"), ...) and see which one fails? > Yes. It's the Via check (2). And I don't see w

Re: [SR-Users] mistakenly detected NAT in IPv6 setup

2015-01-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you split your checks from nat_uac_test("23") to individual checks (like nat_uac_test("1"), nat_uac_test("2"), ...) and see which one fails? Via parameter 'received' contains (always, as per spec) only the IP address, rport is for received port. Perhaps adding [] would not harm, but ot

[SR-Users] mistakenly detected NAT in IPv6 setup

2015-01-23 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi, it looks to me that Kamailio detects NAT without NAT being there, when used in IPv6 scenarios. I have a register, which comes in like this: U 2015/01/23 11:42:31.013284 2a01:1234:123:1234::2:16732 -> 2001:9876:98:9876::aa01:5060 REGISTER sip:domain SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [2a01:1234:123:123