Re: [SR-Users] loading carrierroute failes using another DB

2012-02-06 Thread Uri Shacked
thanks a lot :-) On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote: > On Monday 06 February 2012, Uri Shacked wrote: > > OK, the view i used for the carrierroute table had some wrong field > > types... but still, can someone explain down to details the version > > table..? > > Hi Uri, >

Re: [SR-Users] loading carrierroute failes using another DB

2012-02-06 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Monday 06 February 2012, Uri Shacked wrote: > OK, the view i used for the carrierroute table had some wrong field > types... but still, can someone explain down to details the version > table..? Hi Uri, the version table enables the server to detect wrong table versions for other modules lik

Re: [SR-Users] loading carrierroute failes using another DB

2012-02-06 Thread Uri Shacked
OK, the view i used for the carrierroute table had some wrong field types... but still, can someone explain down to details the version table..? ** On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Uri Shacked wrote: > Hi, > > I changed the location of the DB kamailio works with. i copied the > relevalt table

[SR-Users] loading carrierroute failes using another DB

2012-02-05 Thread Uri Shacked
Hi, I changed the location of the DB kamailio works with. i copied the relevalt tables and changed the relevant names in the cfg file. while trying to load kamailio i realized that it misses the "veresion" table. first - can someone explain the version table usage? second, after creating and cop