2011/12/21 Andreas Granig :
> We could argue whether to not support square brackets and just allow
> plain IP format, I've no strong opinions on that.
I agree. IPv6 has no brackets, that's just a notation for using in URI's.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
On 12/21/2011 03:47 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Well, the question was not where to store the IPv6 address, rather than
>> in which format. As it is now, it'll allow it both with and without
>> surrounding square brackets. That's where I have no strong opinions.
>
> ok, then push also change to lc
Andreas Granig writes:
> Well, the question was not where to store the IPv6 address, rather than
> in which format. As it is now, it'll allow it both with and without
> surrounding square brackets. That's where I have no strong opinions.
ok, then push also change to lcr_gw schema and include an u
On 12/21/2011 02:43 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> We could argue whether to not support square brackets and just allow
>> plain IP format, I've no strong opinions on that. We just wanted to make
>> it as flexible as possible.
>
> i cannot comment on storing ipv6 address, because i don't know anythin
Andreas Granig writes:
> Exactly. Sorry, forgot that part. Since the patch supports optional
> surrounding square brackets, the max. length of an IPv6 address is 47.
>
> So it's either 8*4+7+2 for normal IPv6, like
> "[:::::::]", or (6*4+5)+1+(4*3+3)+2 for
> tunnel
Hi Juha,
On 12/21/2011 02:11 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> based on the patch i got impression that it uses current ip_addr column
> of lcr_gw table to store also ipv6 address? if so, then also the schema
> file would need to be changed.
Exactly. Sorry, forgot that part. Since the patch supports op
Andreas Granig writes:
> Please find attached the patch against git master, courtesy of my
> colleague Richard Fuchs .
>
> Please review and apply if acceptable.
andreas,
based on the patch i got impression that it uses current ip_addr column
of lcr_gw table to store also ipv6 address? if so,
Hello Juha,
On 12/15/2011 01:22 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Just realized that lcr module does not support IPv6 yet. Is there
>> already any work going on here? Otherwise we'd take this task over.
>
> i don't know of such work. if you decide to do it, try to not cause any
> performance hit for c
Andreas Granig writes:
> Just realized that lcr module does not support IPv6 yet. Is there
> already any work going on here? Otherwise we'd take this task over.
i don't know of such work. if you decide to do it, try to not cause any
performance hit for current ipv4 usage.
-- juha
_
All,
Just realized that lcr module does not support IPv6 yet. Is there
already any work going on here? Otherwise we'd take this task over.
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER
10 matches
Mail list logo
