Hello,
On 8/2/11 11:59 AM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
Daniel,
On 02.08.2011 11:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
No, it does not (30 < 150). I've also tried settings max_inv_lifetime
to even greater 300 seconds, no luck..
OK. Btw, do you set both parameters of t_set_fr(...)?
I've tried add
Daniel,
On 02.08.2011 11:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
No, it does not (30 < 150). I've also tried settings max_inv_lifetime
to even greater 300 seconds, no luck..
OK. Btw, do you set both parameters of t_set_fr(...)?
I've tried adding a second parameter, also inserted t_reset_fr() befo
On 8/1/11 7:27 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 01.08.2011 20:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
does it happen to exceed the max lifetime for transaction?
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#max_inv_lifetime
No, it does not (30 < 150). I've also tried settin
Hi Daniel,
On 01.08.2011 20:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
does it happen to exceed the max lifetime for transaction?
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#max_inv_lifetime
No, it does not (30 < 150). I've also tried settings max_inv_lifetime to
even greater 300 seconds
Hello,
On 8/1/11 4:44 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
I've got stuck today trying to implement some sequential forking
scenario. When the call comes destined to the local user, I'm trying
to reach it sequentially through two alternative extensions. For each
extension, I'm calling t_set_fr with a
I've got stuck today trying to implement some sequential forking
scenario. When the call comes destined to the local user, I'm trying to
reach it sequentially through two alternative extensions. For each
extension, I'm calling t_set_fr with a timeout of 15sec. They reply only
180 and do not pic
