Re: [SR-Users] flags documentation

On 22/11/2016 06:08, Alex Balashov wrote: > Ah, I think I know where I got it from. :-) > > http://blog.miconda.eu/2009/12/best-of-new-in-kamailio-300-3-route.html > > So the question is, is this a "sanctioned" approach, or just something > eccentric that happens to be supported? And if the forme

Re: [SR-Users] flags documentation

Hello, On 22/11/2016 06:03, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi, > > I have this set up in my configuration boilerplate: > > -- > flags > DUMMY : 1, > PDD_DAMPEN : 2, > PROXY_MEDIA_SET: 3, > #!ifdef WITH_NAT_TRAVERSAL > SIPPING : 4, > #!endif >

Re: [SR-Users] flags documentation

Ah, I think I know where I got it from. :-) http://blog.miconda.eu/2009/12/best-of-new-in-kamailio-300-3-route.html So the question is, is this a "sanctioned" approach, or just something eccentric that happens to be supported? And if the former, perhaps a documentation update is in order? I

[SR-Users] flags documentation

Hi, I have this set up in my configuration boilerplate: -- flags DUMMY : 1, PDD_DAMPEN : 2, PROXY_MEDIA_SET: 3, #!ifdef WITH_NAT_TRAVERSAL SIPPING : 4, #!endif DUMMY2 : 12 -- I then use these aliases in transaction flag