Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> I think Juha added a new way lately, to encode/decode source ip/port in
> the contact uri.
yes, but that only replaces with fix_nated_contact and can be used if
someone wants to re-use tcp connections between proxy and UAs and wants
to always deliver to UAs cor
On 6/2/10 4:01 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jun 02, 2010 at 15:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/2/10 3:00 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
[...]
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper cont
On Jun 02, 2010 at 15:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/10 3:00 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
> >[...]
> >>
> >>On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >>>No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
> >>>received column. I do this al
On 6/2/10 3:00 PM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
[...]
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the
"proper" way.
should be the or
On Jun 02, 2010 at 10:58, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.06.2010 10:46, schrieb Klaus Darilion:
> >
> >
> >Am 01.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >>>Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 6/1/10 9:07 PM,
On 6/2/10 10:58 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 02.06.2010 10:46, schrieb Klaus Darilion:
Am 01.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed
Am 02.06.2010 10:46, schrieb Klaus Darilion:
Am 01.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
re
Am 01.06.2010 22:08, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even thou
On 6/1/10 10:02 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the
"proper" way.
should be the original one
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the
"proper" way.
should be the original one with the last version, afaik. There were
is
On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the
"proper" way.
should be the original one with the last version, afaik. There were
issues with phones accepting calls
No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the
received column. I do this all the time, even though it's not the
"proper" way.
On 06/01/2010 01:41 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
Does somebody know what happens when I call fix_nated_contact() and
save() on a REGISTER req
Hi!
Does somebody know what happens when I call fix_nated_contact() and
save() on a REGISTER request?
What will be stored and used as RURI? The original contact URI or the
fixed one?
I would guess the original one, as message manipulations are not visible
when calling save() - true?
rega
13 matches
Mail list logo
