2010/7/13 Timo Reimann :
>> Me too. There is no a "timer for dialog" in RFC 3261 so reusing
>> transaction timers is the best approach IMHO.
>
> I have tested and committed the proposed re-usage of the transaction
> timer to sip-router, Kamailio 3.0 and 1.5.
Great, already compiled and will use it
Hey,
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/6/23 Timo Reimann :
>> AFAICS, the current implementation removes dialog entries right after
>> the moment the final request/response pair was seen. In order to prolong
>> a dying dialog's lifetime, I see two possibilities: Use some
>> time-triggered function
2010/6/23 Timo Reimann :
> AFAICS, the current implementation removes dialog entries right after
> the moment the final request/response pair was seen. In order to prolong
> a dying dialog's lifetime, I see two possibilities: Use some
> time-triggered function that delays dialog deletion for a shor
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>>> 2.) Various race conditions may generate log messages such as following
>>> when DID mode is enabled:
>>>
>>> WARNING:dialog:dlg_onroute: unable to find
Hi,
Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
>> 2.) Various race conditions may generate log messages such as following
>> when DID mode is enabled:
>>
>> WARNING:dialog:dlg_onroute: unable to find dialog for
>> with route param 'faf.f69e7b4' [4015:79161711]
>>
Hey Iñaki,
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/6/22 Timo Reimann :
>> 1.) The module considers requests routed in early (but not yet
>> confirmed) dialogs to be bogus, as can be seen from a few lines of state
>> machine code in dlg_hash.c:
>>
>> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-rout
2010/6/22 Timo Reimann :
> 1.) The module considers requests routed in early (but not yet
> confirmed) dialogs to be bogus, as can be seen from a few lines of state
> machine code in dlg_hash.c:
>
> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob;f=modules_k/dialog/dlg_hash.c;h=6ab
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Timo Reimann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have two issues related to dialog module state keeping/logging that
> caught my attention today:
>
> 1.) The module considers requests routed in early (but not yet
> confirmed) dialogs to be bogus, as can be seen from a few lines
Hello,
I have two issues related to dialog module state keeping/logging that
caught my attention today:
1.) The module considers requests routed in early (but not yet
confirmed) dialogs to be bogus, as can be seen from a few lines of state
machine code in dlg_hash.c:
http://git.sip-router.org/cg
