Hi Carlos,
Any updates on this?
Kelvin Chua
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> i am not sure if this is related but, there are cases when if a user adds
> credit, it does not reflect on cnxcc.active_clients
> after the next call. somehow, cnxcc saves the old credit and does n
i am not sure if this is related but, there are cases when if a user adds
credit, it does not reflect on cnxcc.active_clients
after the next call. somehow, cnxcc saves the old credit and does not
update it
Kelvin Chua
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz <
carlos.ruizd...@gmail.com
Hi Kelvin,
this is an interesting scenario. I will have to reproduce it myself in
order to reply you properly.
Answering your question, yes, it should be updated to 200. Let me check
ASAP.
Regards,
Carlos
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> hi carlos,
>
> i have a serial
hi carlos,
i have a serial forking scenario to several providers as failover. and i
used cnxcc_set_max_credit to control the session credit/time.
just wanted to make sure it does what i think it should do so i made a
little experiment.
the logic goes this way.
1. cnxcc_set_max_credit -> $100, cos
