Re: [SR-Users] branche_route support

2013-05-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/10/13 4:16 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote: Hello Daniel, thank's for your help... I was thinking to use $fs (forced socket) variable in branch_route to know what interface packet will be sending and set the correct rtpproxy parameters (I don't know if is a better solution). I will tes

Re: [SR-Users] branche_route support

2013-05-10 Thread Bruno Bresciani
Hello Daniel, thank's for your help... I was thinking to use $fs (forced socket) variable in branch_route to know what interface packet will be sending and set the correct rtpproxy parameters (I don't know if is a better solution). I will test your solution too. Best Regards 2013/5/10 Daniel-Co

Re: [SR-Users] branche_route support

2013-05-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/8/13 8:24 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote: Hi all, currently I have been used kamailio and rtpproxy to listen on two different network (bridge mode), and the register of sip users are saved on different locations ("aliases" and "location") according the interface where register is rece

[SR-Users] branche_route support

2013-05-08 Thread Bruno Bresciani
Hi all, currently I have been used kamailio and rtpproxy to listen on two different network (bridge mode), and the register of sip users are saved on different locations ("aliases" and "location") according the interface where register is received. When there is a call to a user registered, I use