Re: [SR-Users] async_workers vs. async workers modparam in case of async_route()

2016-11-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 22/11/2016 06:20, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 11/21/2016 06:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> At this moment, from what I remember by heart, mysql module and async >> (when using async_task_route()) use async_workers from the core. > > What about sql_query_async()? I assume that uses c

Re: [SR-Users] async_workers vs. async workers modparam in case of async_route()

2016-11-21 Thread Alex Balashov
On 11/21/2016 06:44 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: At this moment, from what I remember by heart, mysql module and async (when using async_task_route()) use async_workers from the core. What about sql_query_async()? I assume that uses core async_workers too. I don't recall exactly, but

Re: [SR-Users] async_workers vs. async workers modparam in case of async_route()

2016-11-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 21/11/16 06:41, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi, > > If I am using async_route() with delay, what is the relationship > between the core async_workers parameter value and the async module > 'workers' modparam? > > This doc change was intended to clarify it, I think: > > https://www.mail-archi

[SR-Users] async_workers vs. async workers modparam in case of async_route()

2016-11-20 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi, If I am using async_route() with delay, what is the relationship between the core async_workers parameter value and the async module 'workers' modparam? This doc change was intended to clarify it, I think: https://www.mail-archive.com/sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org/msg25002.html But it doe