On 04/08/2015 03:32 PM, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:
In my opinion, Nginx has a better solution then apache for WS proxy. It
allows to define "extra" headers that the proxy service is suppose to
forward to backend server, so that back-end server have full
understanding of client characteristics (incl
i somewhat agree with Daniel. The wstunnel should forward Connection and
Upgrade headers, instead of absorbing them. Otherwise kamailio or whatever
back-end server you may use will never know it is WS connection, thus would
treat the connection in simple HTTP context.
In my opinion, Nginx has a be
On 08/04/15 15:28, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> It still not clear to me what is going (or expected) to happen
>> afterwards. Will this connection be http or websocket? Because websocket
>> requires framing of the data. Http stays tcp streaming connection.
>>
>> Gi
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> It still not clear to me what is going (or expected) to happen
> afterwards. Will this connection be http or websocket? Because websocket
> requires framing of the data. Http stays tcp streaming connection.
>
> Given that it is started as HTTP but no Upgrade is
On 07/04/15 11:04, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>>> forgot to include an example of a GET request from the tunnel:
>>>
>>> GET / HTTP/1.1.
>>> Host: 192.98.102.30:8000.
>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
>>> Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> > forgot to include an example of a GET request from the tunnel:
> >
> > GET / HTTP/1.1.
> > Host: 192.98.102.30:8000.
> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
> > Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.6.0.
> > Accept: text/html,application/xh
Hello,
On 06/04/15 14:41, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Juha Heinanen writes:
>
>> apache 2.4 has capability to tunnel websocket requests:
>>
>> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.html
>>
>> the tunnel also automatically upgrades the connection to websocket
>> connection meaning th
Juha Heinanen writes:
> apache 2.4 has capability to tunnel websocket requests:
>
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.html
>
> the tunnel also automatically upgrades the connection to websocket
> connection meaning that ws_handle_handshake() is not needed.
>
> has anyone
apache 2.4 has capability to tunnel websocket requests:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.html
the tunnel also automatically upgrades the connection to websocket
connection meaning that ws_handle_handshake() is not needed.
has anyone managed to configure kamailio to handle
