Will this kind of application require the multi_leg_info modparam for the
acc module? I didn't have to use it with OpenSIPS, but I'm running out of
ideas with Kamailio.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:29 PM, thrillerbee wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Are you referring to the modparam that would incl
Alex,
Are you referring to the modparam that would include accounting CANCELs? If
so, no - I'm not doing that because I don't want to account the CANCEL
transaction. I only wish to account the INVITE transaction & final response
(487). I have found that I can force a 487 response back to the origi
On 01/24/2011 05:53 PM, thrillerbee wrote:
After more investigation, it seems my issue is not just with the
accounting module. Instead of proxying the 487 back to the original
UAC, Kamailio passes a 302. To simplify, I've removed the leg outbound
from Kamailio to the carrier:
0.00 caller ->
After more investigation, it seems my issue is not just with the accounting
module. Instead of proxying the 487 back to the original UAC, Kamailio
passes a 302. To simplify, I've removed the leg outbound from Kamailio to
the carrier:
0.00 caller -> Kamailio SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:15202362
I'm converting my OpenSIPS routers to Kamailio & have run into a small
complication. The proxy pushes all INVITEs to a least-cost router. This LCR
responds with a list of routes as contact instances in a 302 Redirect. Calls
are routing a serially forking normally. Connected & failed calls account
n