Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-10-01 Thread Dani Popa
Hi, sip-communicator doesn't have full implemented authorization steps for xcap. You have to add the contact in your list, and the contact have to add you in his list to see him online. Dani Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, to be sure you have last version, have you updated ka

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-10-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, to be sure you have last version, have you updated kamailio config like in the wiki as well, or only sip communicator? Cheers, Daniel On 10/1/10 3:00 PM, X- x -X wrote: Hey Daniel, I tested the with sip-communicator-1.0-alpha6-nightly.build.2979-linux.bin

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-10-01 Thread X- x -X
Hey Daniel, I tested the with sip-communicator-1.0-alpha6-nightly.build.2979-linux.bin . The thing about contact still being in the buddy list still holds. (I.e the status of the person (Alice) online

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 9/30/10 5:13 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: what are the models for these nokia phones? I have some with sip client inside, but they might be old -- i haven't seen any xcap settings there. daniel, the phone should have VoIP Release 3.0 or later: http://www.for

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > what are the models for these nokia phones? I have some with sip client > inside, but they might be old -- i haven't seen any xcap settings > there. daniel, the phone should have VoIP Release 3.0 or later: http://www.forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/e8606

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 9/30/10 3:27 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: SC and xcap support is in an early stage as well, I mentioned in the tutorials some things, like auto-adding accept rule for an watcher when you subscribe to it (you become watcher for your watcher). I am waiting for a

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > SC and xcap support is in an early stage as well, I mentioned in the > tutorials some things, like auto-adding accept rule for an watcher when > you subscribe to it (you become watcher for your watcher). I am waiting > for a bug to be fixed in bria 3.1 for mor

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 9/30/10 2:54 PM, X- x -X wrote: Hi Daniel. Thanks. It works like a charm. Very expressive tutorial. but just looking at the logs I see stuff like this which is erroring. doesnt crash the server or stuff just some error Tested with "sip-communicator-1.0-alpha6-nightly.build.2976

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-30 Thread X- x -X
Hi Daniel. Thanks. It works like a charm. Very expressive tutorial. but just looking at the logs I see stuff like this which is erroring. doesnt crash the server or stuff just some error Tested with "sip-communicator-1.0-alpha6-nightly.build.2976-linux.bin" And the specs/conf on that tutorial

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I was writing and just published a complete tutorial about this topic (sent an email few minutes ago), see the docs at: http://bit.ly/btrJij Let me know if works for you. Whenever you have a problem, try to be very descriptive with what does not work. Also, gather message logs and SI

[SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

2010-09-29 Thread X- x -X
Hi Daniel, Im a kamailio 3.1 (testing noobie) Im trying to setup a simple buddy list supporting presence server. (I gather xcap is the way to go) The simple presence thingy works nicely & instantly (thanks to those #!defines ) But I haven't been able to get this configuration going http://si