-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:44 AM
To: Aleš Šturm; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status
I pushed the commit to add the new parameter to the master branch. Let me know
if works as expected.
Chee
re willing to prepare correction I can test
> it. Please let me know.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Ales
>
>
>
> *From:*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2016 12:38 PM
> *To:* Aleš Šturm; 'Kamaili
, 2016 12:38 PM
To: Aleš Šturm; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status
Hello,
to have full flexibility here I am thinking of adding a new module parameter to
set the order-by string when the retrieve_order=1, as it may be different for
; ++--+---+--+
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Ales
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:47 AM
> *To:* Aleš Šturm; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
s
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:47 AM
To: Aleš Šturm; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Wrong Publish status
On 01/06/16 10:42, Aleš Šturm wrote:
Hello,
yes, if the priority is t
On 01/06/16 10:42, Aleš Šturm wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> yes, if the priority is the same, records should be ordered by
> received_time. Acting in this way, when “presentity” table has more
> than one record of the same user with equal priority, to watcher would
> be send Notify message with las
ect * from presentity where username=X and priority=Y order by
received_time desc;
Thanks,
Ales
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:15 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Cc: 'Ales Sturm'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users]
Hello,
skipping the other content to fit in size limits for mailing list ...
On 27/05/16 11:59, Aleš Šturm wrote:
> *I think that statuses with equal “priority” are retrieved by “id” and
> not by “received_time”!?*
Is the above the conclusion and the fix would be to order by
received_time if the
Hello,
Kamailio 4.3:
I am testing Presence module with more complex scenario. I have 2 SIP
clients (presentity) with equal identities (3918) and one watcher (2025).
All my clients are Monster 0.9.25. My Kamailio Presence module is
configured with "retrieve_order=1" (presentity records are
