Re: [SR-Users] Via header branch parameter in ACK message not unique

2011-12-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 12/12/11 12:02 PM, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: Dear Daniel Thanks, this worked! I will inform my carrier that they are handling the ACK 200 message wrong. just one question: the syn_branch=0 is used for only stateless ACK messages? it is used for all stateless forwarded requests. By i

Re: [SR-Users] Via header branch parameter in ACK message not unique

2011-12-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 12/12/11 8:18 AM, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: Dear List I'm currently facing an issue with a carrier whereby they are complaining that the via header branch parameter (sip.Via.branch == "z9hG4bKcydzigwkX") in the ACK messages is not unique which results in some calls being successf

[SR-Users] Via header branch parameter in ACK message not unique

2011-12-11 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Dear List I'm currently facing an issue with a carrier whereby they are complaining that the via header branch parameter (sip.Via.branch == "z9hG4bKcydzigwkX") in the ACK messages is not unique which results in some calls being successful and some terminating after 20 seconds as their sip proxy de