Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/20/11 9:56 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: if I understood right, it is about 200 ACK which are forwarded stateless. If yes, then should be only in forward.c, the condition at line 545, where the assignment can be changed in a memcpy. for example like this? if

[SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-20 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > if I understood right, it is about 200 ACK which are forwarded > stateless. If yes, then should be only in forward.c, the condition at > line 545, where the assignment can be changed in a memcpy. for example like this? if so, i can go and make the commit. --

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/19/11 9:58 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: is the conclusion pointing to the suggested solution in the item you opened on tracker? http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=116&project=1 If not, can you update the item with the recommended sol

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > is the conclusion pointing to the suggested solution in the item you > opened on tracker? > > http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=116&project=1 > > If not, can you update the item with the recommended solution for the > case, it should

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Juha, On 5/18/11 12:12 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Francesco Castellano writes: using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour followed, but I

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Francesco Castellano
Thanks Juha, I apologise, I was unlucky searching before posting. Searching for `"branch parameter" serusers' `about syn_branch' produces better results than mine. Regards, Francesco Castellano On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Francesco Castellano writes: > >> using ve

[SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Francesco Castellano writes: > using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via > inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch > parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour > followed, but I was wonder about the reason for this behaviour

[SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Francesco Castellano
Dear sirs, using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour followed, but I was wonder about the reason for this behaviour and whether it can be a f