Re: [SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-18 Thread Alex Balashov
On 08/18/2016 03:02 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: This is when the sip message was sent from a.b.c.d and the Via header has x.y.z.w. if you get a pcap with the request, we can check and see if the test is true for it. In Noah's case, this posed an issue because the request was being rec

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 17/08/16 20:26, Noah Mehl wrote: > I discussed this with Alex Balashov off-line, and he answered my > questions: > >> >> 1. A flag of 3, I don’t understand. I read the documentation >> >> , >> an

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-17 Thread Noah Mehl
I discussed this with Alex Balashov off-line, and he answered my questions: > > A flag of 3, I don’t understand. I read the documentation > , > and there is a 1,2,4,8,etc… So, I’m guessing that a flag of 3

[SR-Users] Trouble with nat_uac_test()

2016-08-17 Thread Noah Mehl
Hey all,I have a Kamailio implementation (version: kamailio 4.4.1 (x86_64/solaris) 12b048) as part of the Kazoo platform.  I’m having an odd problem with an e2e ACK (after a 200OK after a T38 re-invite), which I’m pretty sure has to do with a Contact header rewrite due to the following (can review