Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:10 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "FC" == Frank Carmickle writes: > > FC> Freeswitch does support most new features of openssl 1.0.1 branch. I > FC> believe it defaults to tls1.1 currently but I believe the goal is to > FC> only enable tls1.2, with ECDHE+AES128 by defaul

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread James Cloos
> "FC" == Frank Carmickle writes: FC> Freeswitch does support most new features of openssl 1.0.1 branch. I FC> believe it defaults to tls1.1 currently but I believe the goal is to FC> only enable tls1.2, with ECDHE+AES128 by default. You can certainly FC> ask it to do what ever openssl supp

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread James Cloos
> "JC" == James Cloos writes: JC> Good point. A quick test shows that contacting asterisk-11 over tls/tcp JC> negotiates rsa key exchange; kamailio does better and agrees to ECDHE-RSA. JC> If the trace is of kama talking to asterisk ephemeral is not likely. Sorry. I forgot which thread th

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread Frank Carmickle
On May 23, 2014, at 12:43 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "FC" == Frank Carmickle writes: > > JC>> If you record the full packet trace, wireshark can use your privkey.pem > JC>> to decode the tls handshake, recover the session key, and use that to > JC>> decode the payload packets. > > FC> This

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread James Cloos
> "FC" == Frank Carmickle writes: JC>> If you record the full packet trace, wireshark can use your privkey.pem JC>> to decode the tls handshake, recover the session key, and use that to JC>> decode the payload packets. FC> This is true if you are not using an ephemeral Diffie Hellman cypher

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-23 Thread Frank Carmickle
On May 22, 2014, at 6:46 PM, James Cloos wrote: > > If you record the full packet trace, wireshark can use your privkey.pem > to decode the tls handshake, recover the session key, and use that to > decode the payload packets. > > Cf http://wiki.wireshark.org/SSL for details. This is true if y

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2014-05-22 Thread James Cloos
> "FB" == Fabian Borot writes: FB> modparam("tls", "private_key", "./privkey.pem") FB> I see some encrypted packets from kamailio to the client but I don't FB> know what is inside. Any help would be very appreciated. If you record the full packet trace, wireshark can use your privkey.pem t

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP On 22.05.2013 15:49, Fabian Borot wrote: Thank you Klaus, good idea, but I forgot to mention that when I configure the client w/o TLS using regular SIP/UDP/5060 I dont have that problem. When the BYE from the called side comes it is sent to the ca

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-23 Thread Klaus Darilion
at To: fbo...@hotmail.com CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP On 22.05.2013 15:49, Fabian Borot wrote: Thank you Klaus, good idea, but I forgot to mention that when I configure the client w/o TLS using regular SIP/UDP/5060 I dont have that problem. When the BY

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-23 Thread Fabian Borot
you again > Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:13:35 +0200 > From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at > To: fbo...@hotmail.com > CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP > > > > On 22.05.2013 15:49, Fabian Borot wrote: >> Thank you Klaus, goo

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-23 Thread Klaus Darilion
thank you again Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:15 +0200 From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org CC: fbo...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP On 21.05.2013 21:54, Fabian Borot wrote: Hi I am using Kamailio 4.0

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/22/13 3:49 PM, Fabian Borot wrote: Thank you Klaus, good idea, but I forgot to mention that when I configure the client w/o TLS using regular SIP/UDP/5060 I dont have that problem. When the BYE from the called side comes it is sent to the calling side without any problems. But I do see t

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-22 Thread Fabian Borot
again > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 10:14:15 +0200 > From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at > To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > CC: fbo...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP > > > > On 21.05.2013 21:54, Fabian Borot wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am us

Re: [SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-22 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 21.05.2013 21:54, Fabian Borot wrote: Hi I am using Kamailio 4.0.1 in front of an asterisk servers farm to handle TLS with our clients and providers. The idea is to have kamailio "talking" SIP/UDP/5060 and TLS/TCP/5061 with the customers and providers and regular SIP/UDP/5060 with our int

[SR-Users] TLS and SIP

2013-05-21 Thread Fabian Borot
Hi I am using Kamailio 4.0.1 in front of an asterisk servers farm to handle TLS with our clients and providers. The idea is to have kamailio "talking" SIP/UDP/5060 and TLS/TCP/5061 with the customers and providers and regular SIP/UDP/5060 with our internal asterisk servers. So far at least fo