Hello,
look at ims_auth module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/11/15 10:24, Anil Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I want to enable AKAv2-MD5 type authentication using a plain kamailio.
>
> Is there any way I can achieve it ?
>
> Please do needful.
>
> Thanks
> Anil
>
>
> __
Hi,
I want to enable AKAv2-MD5 type authentication using a plain kamailio.
Is there any way I can achieve it ?
Please do needful.
Thanks
Anil
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
ht
On 03/09/14 02:28, James Cloos wrote:
"KD" == Klaus Darilion writes:
KD> Maybe we can find some software with SNI support and BSD license
KD> and then copy/paste the code.
nginx is a possibility.
Thanks for the hint. I will have it in my mind if Klaus or some other
developer has no time for
> "KD" == Klaus Darilion writes:
KD> Maybe we can find some software with SNI support and BSD license
KD> and then copy/paste the code.
nginx is a possibility.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
___
SIP Express Router (SER
Adding SNI was rather easy. I used the original SNI patch for Apache and
copy-pasted this patch into Kamailio. We could do this again, but this
patch does not have any license details, thus I would recommend to not
do it. Unfortunately I haven't found proper SNI API desription of
libssl. Maybe we c
Hi Klaus,
thanks for updating on the status.
Do you remember what implied to add support for SNI?
It should be brought back if we lost it. Maybe you can adapt the old
patch if it not something that complex and you have time to look at it.
Otherwise, any further details about what you had to d
Indeed, currently Kamailio does not support SNI (was dropped with ser merge)
Klaus
On 29.08.2014 16:11, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> starting with 3.0 we got the implementation from SER at that time (being
> more flexible with config and later getting asynchronous support).
>
>
Hello,
starting with 3.0 we got the implementation from SER at that time (being
more flexible with config and later getting asynchronous support).
A quick grep in the sources shows things related to server_name, but
apparently is just for accessing them via cfg selects.
I cc-ed Jan who is a
Hi,
Back in Kamailio 1.5, the release notes state:
"support for TLS server_name extension (aka SNI=server name indication)"
However, I cannot find any indication of this in the current TLS docs, and
trying to set tls_server_name or server_name in tls.cfg fails with
"unsupported option".
Is this
Dear Sr,
Is it possible to use QuteCom softphone with iptel.org SIP service?
Regards
Cristian A. Zúñiga___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Hello,
yes, kamailio/ser support video calls out of the box, because it does
not do media stream processing.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/17/12 2:18 PM, Murali Krish wrote:
Hi this is Murali krishnan i am final student of master degree in
Dalhousie University, I am Working on my project, i m need of
Hi this is Murali krishnan i am final student of master degree in Dalhousie
University, I am Working on my project, i m need of a sip server which can
support H.264 codec video calls...I created an account in iptel sip account
when i used the account it doesn't support video calls. If i use SER wil
Hello,
On 1/4/11 6:47 PM, Watkins, Bradley wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Olle E. Johansson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:24 PM
To: kamailio SR-Users
Subject: [SR-Users] Support for
>-Original Message-
>From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
>[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
>Olle E. Johansson
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:24 PM
>To: kamailio SR-Users
>Subject: [SR-Users] Support for via ;maddr
>
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 18:24 +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Friends,
> We've had an interesting discussion on the Asterisk-dev mailing list about
> supporting the ;maddr and ;ttl attributes in the via header when sending
> responses. We've agreed that it should be considered harmful and suggest
Friends,
We've had an interesting discussion on the Asterisk-dev mailing list about
supporting the ;maddr and ;ttl attributes in the via header when sending
responses. We've agreed that it should be considered harmful and suggest making
it configurable whether to support it in Asterisk.
My ques
16 matches
Mail list logo
