Re: [SR-Users] Sending NOTIFY using t_uac_dlg over xmlrpc

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/4/12 12:54 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote: That's what I thought too. There are no errors in the debug log. Since I am using xmlrpc instead of fifo, are there any restrictions on the format? maybe you can get more details if you run with debug=3. Should be no restriction, apart of va

Re: [SR-Users] Sending NOTIFY using t_uac_dlg over xmlrpc

2012-05-04 Thread Krishna Kurapati
That's what I thought too. There are no errors in the debug log. Since I am using xmlrpc instead of fifo, are there any restrictions on the format? Krish Kura On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > t_uac_dlg is general purpose command, so it should work wit

Re: [SR-Users] Sending NOTIFY using t_uac_dlg over xmlrpc

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, t_uac_dlg is general purpose command, so it should work with notify as well -- iirc, kamctl had some ping command that used NOTIFY. Do you get any error in the log messages? Cheers, Daniel On 4/27/12 11:48 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote: Hi, I was able to send MESSAGE using xmlrpc (mi a

[SR-Users] Sending NOTIFY using t_uac_dlg over xmlrpc

2012-04-27 Thread Krishna Kurapati
Hi, I was able to send MESSAGE using xmlrpc (mi and t_uac_dlg) I got the 200 OK response to the message. However, when I try to send NOTIFY, I receive HTTP response but with empty methodResponse. Is NOTIFY not suppored by t_uac_dlg? Thanks Krish Kura POST /RPC2 HTTP/1.0 User-Agent: ruby-sip-cli