On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Torsten Hantzsche wrote:
> Bastian, thanks for the explanation. I have Kamailio running on FreeBSD
> and never thought of a difference in the routing table compared to Linux.
> The option WITH_IPAUTH did the trick.
There is no difference in routing to the
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Bastian Triller wrote:
Add #!define WITH_IPAUTH to your script and the server's IP address to the
address table and restart Kamailio.
Packets from your local address to your local address are routed through your
loopback interface. lo0 looks like some BSD, so you can ve
Add #!define WITH_IPAUTH to your script and the server's IP address to the
address table and restart Kamailio.
Packets from your local address to your local address are routed through
your loopback interface. lo0 looks like some BSD, so you can verify that in
the routing table with netstat -rn
On
Hi,
while playing with the script from
http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf
and "kamailio 4.4.3 (x86_64/freebsd) 5a2195" I could not see any NOTIFY packet
going out to the subscribed watcher.
"tcpdump -i lo0" shows self injected PUBLISH packets challenged with
"407 Proxy Authenticati
