Re: [SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 26/05/16 17:40, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 05/26/2016 11:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> You can use a htable for the rescue, either storing the selected IP >> within onsend_route or when the replies are coming back. An >> alternative is to store as a dialog variable. > > Okay, so I

Re: [SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-26 Thread Alex Balashov
On 05/26/2016 11:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: You can use a htable for the rescue, either storing the selected IP within onsend_route or when the replies are coming back. An alternative is to store as a dialog variable. Okay, so I'd need to keep my own state. If I understood correctl

Re: [SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
You can use a htable for the rescue, either storing the selected IP within onsend_route or when the replies are coming back. An alternative is to store as a dialog variable. Cheers, Daniel On 25/05/16 22:53, Alex Balashov wrote: > Oh, if only I were personally responsible for the initiative behi

Re: [SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-25 Thread Alex Balashov
Oh, if only I were personally responsible for the initiative behind this question... :) My best guess is that SRV is viewed here as an LB mechanism only and without any interest in fail over. -- Alex -- Principal, Evariste Systems LLC (www.evaristesys.com) Sent from my Google Nexus. _

Re: [SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-25 Thread Fred Posner
On 05/25/2016 04:32 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry if this is a tired, worn question, but I've not dealt much with > Kamailio's SRV support before: > > If a registrant has a contact binding whose domain component is subject > to an SRV lookup with load-balanced or weighted entries, h

[SR-Users] SRV and dialog stickiness

2016-05-25 Thread Alex Balashov
Hello, Sorry if this is a tired, worn question, but I've not dealt much with Kamailio's SRV support before: If a registrant has a contact binding whose domain component is subject to an SRV lookup with load-balanced or weighted entries, how does one solve the problem of ensuring that subsequ