Re: [SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

2013-11-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 11/23/13 1:00 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote: the patch worked is it safe to commit to 4.0? Yes, I backported in the git branch 4.0. Cheers, Daniel On Nov 21, 2013 4:34 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > wrote: > > If you still have the old core, can you get the content

Re: [SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

2013-11-22 Thread Kelvin Chua
the patch worked is it safe to commit to 4.0? On Nov 21, 2013 4:34 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > > If you still have the old core, can you get the content of f in frame 1 from gdb? > > frame 1 > p *f > > If you are going to test with the patch I suggested in previous email, can you set

Re: [SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

2013-11-19 Thread Kelvin Chua
I can reproduce it consistently. I am doing serial forking into a non-existent host, when the caller gets impatient, it cancels the call and send another invite. this happens after that. full backtrace: #0 qm_detach_free (frag=0x7fb2b552e2b0, qm=) at mem/q_malloc.c:269 prev = 0x7fb2b5192

Re: [SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

2013-11-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you get the output for 'bt full'? Probably you have to install the debug symbols (kamailio-dbg package) for getting something useful. Another question, can you reproduce it? Or it happens sporadically? Cheers, Daniel On 11/19/13 1:11 PM, Kelvin Chua wrote: kamailio 4.0.4 has an

[SR-Users] SEG FAULT dialog

2013-11-19 Thread Kelvin Chua
kamailio 4.0.4 has anybody experience this using dialog module? backtrace: #0 0x0057af45 in qm_malloc () #1 0x7f268ac0fe93 in set_dlg_variable_unsafe () from /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/dialog.so #2 0x7f268ac123aa in pv_set_dlg_variable () from /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/mo