Re: [SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

2010-09-07 Thread Siddhardha Garige
Klaus, Thanks. I removed to tag check from config file. Thanks Sid "May the light be with you." __ Siddhardha Garige www.luminepixels.com --- On Mon, 9/6/10, Klaus Darilion wrote: From: Klaus Darilion Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing i

Re: [SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

2010-09-06 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 06.09.2010 11:00, schrieb Olle E. Johansson: Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3: "Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a REGISTER request. Registrars MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response

Re: [SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

2010-09-06 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3: "Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a REGISTER request. Registrars MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER request. A registrar might receive a

Re: [SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

2010-09-06 Thread Klaus Darilion
The REGISTER request contains the "pre-loaded route set". Pre-loaded route sets are for security reasons disabled in the default config (to-tag check): if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) {

[SR-Users] Routing issues with SIP Route headers.

2010-09-04 Thread Siddhardha Garige
Hello all, I am having little trouble routing registrations based on route header in following configuration. UA sends registration to P1 and P1 is ignoring “route header” and forwards registration request to Registrar.   I am using default kamailio configuration. Is there any thing I nee