Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-18 Thread Darren Campbell (Primar)
om: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 18 May 2015 4:59 PM To: Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch Hello, but fix_nated_sdp() is changing the SDP (body) not Contact header. Maybe you had fix_nat

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch > > Yes, you can send me directly, just notify here so I will look in the > global inbox, because I check it quire rarely -- I is a lot of > unsolicited emails I get there and I ha

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-17 Thread Darren Campbell (Primar)
hange. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, 16 May 2015 3:57 AM To: Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch Yes, you can send me directly, just notify here so I

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
to the list. > > > *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:03 PM > *To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch > > > > On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Ca

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-14 Thread Darren Campbell (Primar)
List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote: Here's the full conversation. Makes me wonder whether the ACK needs to go back to the same host that handled the INVITE or whether it should be returned to the host mentioned in

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote: > Here's the full conversation. Makes me wonder whether the ACK needs to > go back to the same host that handled the INVITE or whether it should > be returned to the host mentioned in "c=IN IP4 PROVIDERMEDIAIP" in the > 200 OK. You still gave the

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-12 Thread Darren Campbell (Primar)
MEDIAIP:5060", nonce="VVGs2VVRq620ayXnC7qlie1+Jfz14FtN", response="49aab6f0725de9b6c146f92d64b26b8a" X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Normal Clearing X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 16 Content-Length: 0 17:29:41.506107 IP PROVIDERIP.5060 > 172.21.0.226.5060: SIP, length: 424 E?..?..

Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you show both received 200ok + ACK as well as those sent out? It is important to see how Record-/Route, Contact and r-uri change on the way to spot where the issue is. Cheers, Daniel On 12/05/15 05:56, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote: > Hi all > > Experiencing a commonly reported issue

[SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch

2015-05-11 Thread Darren Campbell (Primar)
Hi all Experiencing a commonly reported issue where calls drop out after 30 seconds or so. Mainly because the provider hangs up after not recognising/receiving ACK in response to 200 OK. Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately), I haven't had much experience with Enswitch so was hoping someone in