On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Am 02.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Alex Hermann:
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
> >> Alex, what happens if one server is down. There will be lots of
> >> "replication transactions" which will timeout. Can this cause any
> >> problems i
Am 02.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Alex Hermann:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
>>> On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of regis
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, you wrote:
> Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
> > On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> >>> I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
> >>> because Kamailio works best when
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
>>> I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations because
>>> Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memory and
>>> registra
On 02/02/2011 12:20 PM, Danny Dias wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking that if i store the contacts that are registered into
my proxy in a database, like this:
.
.
# - usrloc params -
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3)
.
.
if (is_method("REGISTER"))
{
if (!save("location"))
Would be possible.
Have a look at DRBD!
Von: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] Im Auftrag von Danny Dias
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011 11:20
An: kamailio
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Redundancy between 2 Kamailio servers
Hello,
I was
Hello,
I was thinking that if i store the contacts that are registered into my
proxy in a database, like this:
.
.
# - usrloc params -
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 3)
.
.
if (is_method("REGISTER"))
{
if (!save("location"))
sl_reply_error();
exit;
}
.
.
This
2011/1/27 Danny Dias :
>> Two Kamailios in a HeartBeat cluster which manages the kamailio
>> service along with a virtual IP in which kamailios are supposed to
>> listen. Just one kamailio is running (HA manages them).
>>
>
> So, the heartbeat cluster shall manage that both are ok and also check th
Thanks Iñaki,
2011/1/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo
> 2011/1/27 Danny Dias :
> > Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary
> server?
> > and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind
> to
> > the ip of the HA? sorry my friend but i do not understand ver
2011/1/27 Danny Dias :
> Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary server?
> and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind to
> the ip of the HA? sorry my friend but i do not understand very well, i'm
> quite new with redundant systems, could you
2011/1/27 Klaus Darilion :
> Is it possible to bind Kamailio to an IP address which is not active?
> (e.g. start Kamailio on the backup server)
Yes, it depends on a sysctl option of the kernel (I don't remember the
name, sorry). With such option set you can make a server to listen in
a IP which do
On Thursday 27 January 2011 17:18:22 Danny Dias wrote:
> Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary server?
> and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind to
> the ip of the HA? sorry my friend but i do not understand very well, i'm
> quite new wi
Do you mean that both Kamailio-1 and Kamailio-2 will be as primary server?
and the clients will register in the 2 machines? and also they will bind to
the ip of the HA? sorry my friend but i do not understand very well, i'm
quite new with redundant systems, could you please explain a little please?
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Alex, do you also do NAT keep-alive from the proxies? If yes, are you
> sending them from both servers at the same time?
No, we require clients to sent nat-keepalives. It is much more efficient. In
addition, the registrars are not directly acce
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> > Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
>>> > > I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
>>> > > because
>>> > > Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memo
On 01/27/2011 04:15 PM, Danny Dias wrote:
Thanks Alex...
2011/1/27 Alex Hermann mailto:a...@speakup.nl>>
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> > I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of
registrations because
Darilion
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2011 15:18
An: Alex Hermann
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Redundancy between 2 Kamailio servers
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
>> > Yes - the problem with SIP based replication is that both proxies must
>&g
Am 27.01.2011 13:05, schrieb Alex Hermann:
>> > Yes - the problem with SIP based replication is that both proxies must
>> > be running. This is a problem as Kamailio binds to the virtual IP at
>> > start up - thus adding the virtual IP address to the backup server does
>> > not make Backup-Kamail
Thanks Alex...
2011/1/27 Alex Hermann
> On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> > > I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations
> because
> > > Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memory and
> > > reg
On Thursday 27 January 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> > I've read some difficulty in the synchronisation of registrations because
> > Kamailio works best when it stores registrations in memory and
> > registrations are constantly changing - they expire and
Am 27.01.2011 11:21, schrieb Danny Dias:
> Hello my friends,
>
> I wonder if someone has done this before? i would like to implement 2
> Kamailio servers with redundancy, something like the following:
>
> SERVER_A is working as the primary sip proxy (virtual IP as the sip
> signaling), if it fa
Hello my friends,
I wonder if someone has done this before? i would like to implement 2
Kamailio servers with redundancy, something like the following:
SERVER_A is working as the primary sip proxy (virtual IP as the sip
signaling), if it fails, the other server (sleeping) should UP the virtual
IP
22 matches
Mail list logo
