Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-08 Thread Vitaliy Aleksandrov
What would happen in this case? If I understand correctly, the proxy will always forward the request but the last hop (before the UAS) will forward the request only if a connection is active? correct. If the last hop doesn't forward the request because no TCP connection exists, what happe

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-08 Thread Mickael Marrache
w the proxy will detect this situation? From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Vitaliy Aleksandrov Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 4:06 PM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support Hi, I suppose ca

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-08 Thread Vitaliy Aleksandrov
s.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Vitaliy Aleksandrov *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:34 AM *To:* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support *set_forward_no_connect()* called after lookup() prevents kamailio from making a new connection

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-07 Thread Mickael Marrache
-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Vitaliy Aleksandrov Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:34 AM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support set_forward_no_connect() called after lookup() prevents kamailio from making a new

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-06 Thread Vitaliy Aleksandrov
ation lookup? *From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel-Constantin Mierla *Sent:* Monday, May 04, 2015 11:07 PM *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support Hello, where are typically

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-05 Thread Mickael Marrache
lf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:07 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support Hello, where are typically those issues with truncated SDP? On the phones? If you use tcp and have phones behind the nat,

Re: [SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, where are typically those issues with truncated SDP? On the phones? If you use tcp and have phones behind the nat, it is recommended to not connect if there is no active connection after location lookup -- see core functions for tcp. Cheers, Daniel On 04/05/15 13:54, Mickael Marrache wro

[SR-Users] Recommended configuration for TCP support

2015-05-04 Thread Mickael Marrache
Hi, We sometimes get issues caused by truncated SDP bodies. Therefore, we are looking at using TCP instead of UDP. What is the recommended configuration when TCP is used? Currently, I only have the following: children=16 listen=udp::5060 listen=tcp::5060 disable_tcp=no tcp_conne