I also saw this recently in Kamailio and can not remember having this
seen before.
In your case Kamailio is doing some loose-route/strict-route conversion
which of course is buggy.
I think the problem is related that Kamailio does not correctly identify
that the Route header addresses himsel
Definitely not adding it back anywhere. Is it possible that loose_route()
or t_relay() would add it back? These are the relevant blocks of code this
call is traversing.
xlog("L_ERR","We have a Proxy Route request, performing loose routing to
end point [$(hdr(Route))]");
remove_hf("P-Proxy-Route"
Hi Geoffrey,
it looks like you add the Route header somewhere else, since the
Route-Header has a different position before and after Kamailio. Maybe
a lookup (with Path?) or similar? If you want to remove a header,
which you added previously in the routing logic, then you will have to
apply the ch
Can anyone tell me why Kamailio 4.0 is sending the INVITE out with the
Route Header intact? The call is running through this block which I
thought should remove it before sending it out. The far end is having a
hard time dealing with the fact that the Route header is in there and we
aren't lookin
