Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration

2016-03-31 Thread Alex Balashov
On 03/31/2016 06:52 PM, Jignesh Gandhi wrote: Are you saying that in-dialog request can be routed automatically by Kamailio to the correct Asterisk instance on the back end ? Yes. This is not so much a feature of Kamailio as a requirement of standards-compliant proxy behaviour. And this is

Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration

2016-03-31 Thread Jignesh Gandhi
/lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160329/b91e2df1/attachment-0001.html> > >-- > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:24:01 + >From: Jignesh Gandhi >To: "sr-users@lists.sip-router.org" >Subject: [SR-Use

[SR-Users] Proxy configuration

2016-03-29 Thread Jignesh Gandhi
Hello, Is it possible to use kamailio to be a stateful outbound proxy ? The use case is kamailio is an outbound proxy for multiple instances of Asterisk. Thus all responses need to go back to the same instance of Asterisk that generated them. After the call is established. How can I ensure tha

Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration

2016-03-29 Thread Alex Balashov
Jignesh, Everything you're asking for is part of Kamailio's core functionality: 1. Most useful applications of Kamailio involve stateful relay, and the stock included configurations are stateful. 2. The loose-routing section of the configuration, and, more broadly, RFC 3261 in general, take