Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-27 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey Andreas, Am 27.08.2011 um 11:39 schrieb Andreas Granig: > On 08/16/2011 07:59 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: >> On 16.08.2011 19:43, Timo Reimann wrote: >>> So you'll either have to dig into the commit yourself and separate the >>> fix, get a hold of my entire branch, or wait for 3.1.5 to release. >

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-27 Thread Andreas Granig
Hi Timo, On 08/16/2011 07:59 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: > On 16.08.2011 19:43, Timo Reimann wrote: >> So you'll either have to dig into the commit yourself and separate the >> fix, get a hold of my entire branch, or wait for 3.1.5 to release. > > ...or check out master: I just merged treimann/acc-cd

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Timo Reimann
On 16.08.2011 19:43, Timo Reimann wrote: > So you'll either have to dig into the commit yourself and separate the > fix, get a hold of my entire branch, or wait for 3.1.5 to release. ...or check out master: I just merged treimann/acc-cdr into master which was supposed to happen before the 3.2 feat

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Timo Reimann
On 16.08.2011 19:32, Jon Bonilla wrote: >> I think it's worth a try to see if my git branch already does better for >> your use case. If you could give it a shot I'd be glad to know how it >> works or whether it needs further work on. >> >> > I'll try to get the patch (or the whole dialog module) f

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:26:25 +0200 Timo Reimann escribió: > > I think it's worth a try to see if my git branch already does better for > your use case. If you could give it a shot I'd be glad to know how it > works or whether it needs further work on. > > Hi Timo I'll try to get the patch

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Timo Reimann
On 16.08.2011 18:54, Jon Bonilla wrote: > El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:38:17 +0200 > Timo Reimann escribió: > >> Hey Jon, >> >> >> On 16.08.2011 18:14, Jon Bonilla wrote: >> >> Looks pretty much like two dialog entries were created for the same >> >> dialog. One of them got cleaned up nicely on call te

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:38:17 +0200 Timo Reimann escribió: > Hey Jon, > > > On 16.08.2011 18:14, Jon Bonilla wrote: > >> Looks pretty much like two dialog entries were created for the same > >> dialog. One of them got cleaned up nicely on call termination while the > >> other one keeps dangling

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey Jon, On 16.08.2011 18:14, Jon Bonilla wrote: >> Looks pretty much like two dialog entries were created for the same >> dialog. One of them got cleaned up nicely on call termination while the >> other one keeps dangling until the dialog timer kicks in (12 hours in >> your case). >> >> Most not

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:26 +0200 Jon Bonilla (Manwe) escribió: > > Then, after the call has been rejected I see two dialogs in my list: > > sercmd> dlg.profile_get_size total > Profile:total => profile:total value: count:2 > sercmd> dlg.profile_get_size user > Profile:user => profile:user va

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:14:12 +0200 Jon Bonilla (Manwe) escribió: > El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:03:48 +0200 > Timo Reimann escribió: > > > > > If that's not the case: Can you check the Kamailio logs for any > > suspicious dialog-related log messages, particularly those with WARN or > > higher log ve

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:03:48 +0200 Timo Reimann escribió: > Hey, > > > > root@proxy1a:~# grep "fbrzjkplmvlauty@quenya" /var/log/kamailio.log > > New request - M=INVITE > > Dialog set mark TOTAL > > Proxy authentication failed > > New request - M=INVITE > > Dialog set mark TOTAL > > [snip!] >

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
El Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:43:05 +0200 Jon Bonilla (Manwe) escribió: Another example, which is even worse for my configuration: A call rejected by the proxy itself sending a 480 response to the subscriber: New request - M=INVITE Dialog set mark TOTAL Proxy authentication failed New request - M=INVI

Re: [SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey, On 16.08.2011 17:43, Jon Bonilla wrote: > After configured the proxy I've tested a call and I realize that the dialog > list is not empty after the call ends. > > Here's a sample call log and the dialog list while the call was being > stablished and 3 minutes after that: > > root@proxy1a:~

[SR-Users] Persistent dialog

2011-08-16 Thread Manwe
Hi all I'm playing with the dialog module to count the calls and limit the number of calls per subscriber. After configured the proxy I've tested a call and I realize that the dialog list is not empty after the call ends. Here's a sample call log and the dialog list while the call was being sta