Re: [SR-Users] PUA_XMPP: Notify in a non existing dialog

2012-03-10 Thread Dan-Cristian Bogos
Hey Daniel, This time I will have to take back my thoughts about the module not being in "stable" status ;). By using debug=3 I could see the reason of the subscribes not being generated (still could be good to have some error on xmpp side back, but I can live with that for now). The problem was

Re: [SR-Users] PUA_XMPP: Notify in a non existing dialog

2012-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, to, from and type attributes are there, just that the uris are not the format expected. Can you send the log messages for debug=3? Cheers, Daniel On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos < danb.li...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hey Daniel, > > Here is the subscription coming fr

Re: [SR-Users] PUA_XMPP: Notify in a non existing dialog

2012-03-10 Thread Dan-Cristian Bogos
Hey Daniel, Here is the subscription coming from OpenFIRE towards Kamailio when the user is added in the roster on XMPP side: """ T 2012/03/02 09:49:57.743750 127.0.0.1:5275 -> 127.0.0.1:49965 [AP] http://jabber.org/protocol/caps"; ext="voice-v1 video-v1 camera-v1 " hash="sha-1" node="http://jits

Re: [SR-Users] PUA_XMPP: Notify in a non existing dialog

2012-03-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, mqybe is faster to fix the handling of subscriptions from openfire. Can you get the xmpp request with ngrep and paste it here -- maybe it is easy to find and fix the reason the parser in xmpp module fails to understand it. I guess pua_xmpp has to know the dialog for the mapping between the

[SR-Users] PUA_XMPP: Notify in a non existing dialog

2012-03-02 Thread Dan-Cristian Bogos
Guys, After my previous discovered issue (Kamailio not happy to talk with Openfire for subscriptions), trying to find work arounds, thought about using pua_mi to enforce subscriptions coming from XMPP side. The following events happen: * I subscribe over mi interface successfully. * Presence se