Re: [SR-Users] No voice issue with NAT

2010-06-20 Thread JinKevin
k.net To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] No voice issue with NAT The eyebeam has referenced a private address in the SDP ( 172.16.114.1 ), it is my understanding that since this IP is not routable, you'll never get any audio. I believe the purpose of RTPProxy is to br

Re: [SR-Users] No voice issue with NAT

2010-06-20 Thread David
The eyebeam has referenced a private address in the SDP ( 172.16.114.1 ), it is my understanding that since this IP is not routable, you'll never get any audio. I believe the purpose of RTPProxy is to bridge calls that are behind private IPs. I believe you'll need an RTP Proxy or Media Proxy to f

[SR-Users] No voice issue with NAT

2010-06-20 Thread JinKevin
Hi, My kamailio and application server are with Public IPs so the system uses nathelper without RTPProxy. It works with the eyebeam behind the ADSL router, but I cannot hear any voice ( ethereal capture on the PC shows no RTP from the application server) when try it in a Hotel or with a 3G