Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 20/08/15 14:26, Fred Posner wrote: > > On 08/20/2015 08:25 AM, Fred Posner wrote: > > [SNIP] >> Without topology hiding, the Mitel will ignore Record-Route headers. If >> using topology hiding, they will send an in-dialog invite to the sdp c= >> address... >> > EDIT: on the o= information... I

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Fred Posner
On 08/20/2015 08:34 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Fred, > > Throwing in B2BUAs is a common recipe for interop problems; one side > is liberal in what it accepts, the other conservative in what it > emits. In theory. > > ‎For lightweight, signalling-only duty, allow me to suggest SEMS + > its 'sbc' m

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Alex Balashov
Fred, Throwing in B2BUAs is a common recipe for interop problems; one side is liberal in what it accepts, the other conservative in what it emits. In theory. ‎For lightweight, signalling-only duty, allow me to suggest SEMS + its 'sbc' module, though. It gives you a lot of low-level control to s

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Fred Posner
On 08/20/2015 08:25 AM, Fred Posner wrote: [SNIP] > > Without topology hiding, the Mitel will ignore Record-Route headers. If > using topology hiding, they will send an in-dialog invite to the sdp c= > address... > EDIT: on the o= information... I need more sleep. =) --fred

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Fred Posner
On 08/20/2015 04:10 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > By "they try to speak directly with the media server vs the sip server" > -- do you mean they ignore Record-Route headers added by the sip server? > > Cheers, > Daniel > Yes, that would be a much better way of expressing the issue. Wi

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 18/08/15 15:38, Fred Posner wrote: > On 08/18/2015 09:23 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: >> Are there any specific issues you're encountering? >> > Mostly hold issues where they try to speak directly with the media > server vs the sip server; as well as general audio issues in/out. > > Most of these

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-18 Thread Fred Posner
On 08/18/2015 09:23 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Are there any specific issues you're encountering? > Mostly hold issues where they try to speak directly with the media server vs the sip server; as well as general audio issues in/out. Most of these seem to be acl related with a set-up issue on the

Re: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-18 Thread Alex Balashov
h.com/ Sent from my BlackBerry.   Original Message   From: Fred Posner Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 09:22 To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000 I rarely integrate these with Kamailio and am having some "resi

[SR-Users] Mitel 5000 and 3000

2015-08-18 Thread Fred Posner
I rarely integrate these with Kamailio and am having some "resistance" in assisting. I was wondering if anyone would be willing to share any configuration recommendations for Mitel when using Kamailio as a SIP trunk (outbound/inbound). Sincerely, Fred Posner The Palner Group, Inc. http://www.paln