Hello,
On 6/11/11 6:54 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
have you spotted in SIP/SIMPLE specs what has to be sent when the presentity
is offline? My quick google was not that succesful. Maybe Inaki has the
specs more fresh indexed in memory and can help.
If the
On 11/06/2011, at 2:54 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> I based my assumption that the sip/simple presence server should not
>> generate itself a presence/pidf document with status closed/offline since
>> the pidf has a node that is generated by presentity device.
>
> Right. The presence server
On 10/06/2011 9:55 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2011/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Specifically, the RFC says:
"During composition, a presence agent (PA) may encounter a stored
element that covers the present time. The PA MAY either
discard that element or MAY
convert it to a regular
On 10/06/2011 1:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/10/11 10:07 PM, Craig Southeren wrote:
On 10/06/2011 1:01 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:..deleted
So, if a client uploads a presence document that contains a
element, that element could be sent by the PA when
the client goes
2011/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
>> Specifically, the RFC says:
>>
>> "During composition, a presence agent (PA) may encounter a stored
>> element that covers the present time. The PA MAY either
>> discard that element or MAY
>> convert it to a regular element if it considers that
>> info
2011/6/10 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> have you spotted in SIP/SIMPLE specs what has to be sent when the presentity
> is offline? My quick google was not that succesful. Maybe Inaki has the
> specs more fresh indexed in memory and can help.
If the user has not published a "offline" presentity, the
On 6/10/11 10:07 PM, Craig Southeren wrote:
On 10/06/2011 1:01 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:..deleted
So, if a client uploads a presence document that contains a
element, that element could be sent by the PA when
the client goes offline, rather than the entire document being
discard
On 10/06/11 21:58, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 6/10/11 8:17 PM, Craig Southeren wrote:
On 10/06/2011 3:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
..deleted
Ok. But this happens when I start my application, so it does not
know anything about the contacts, and it receives empty body. So,
ev
On 10/06/2011 11:20 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
...deleted
Thank you so far for your explanations.
have you spotted in SIP/SIMPLE specs what has to be sent when the
presentity is offline? My quick google was not that succesful. Maybe
Inaki has the specs more fresh indexed in memory a
On 10/06/2011 3:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
..deleted
Ok. But this happens when I start my application, so it does not
know anything about the contacts, and it receives empty body. So,
even after this notify, it still does not know anything about that
contact, is that right?
Any
On 6/10/11 8:49 PM, Craig Southeren wrote:
On 10/06/2011 11:20 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
...deleted
Thank you so far for your explanations.
have you spotted in SIP/SIMPLE specs what has to be sent when the
presentity is offline? My quick google was not that succesful. Maybe
Inak
On 6/10/11 8:17 PM, Craig Southeren wrote:
On 10/06/2011 3:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
..deleted
Ok. But this happens when I start my application, so it does not
know anything about the contacts, and it receives empty body. So,
even after this notify, it still does not know anyt
On 6/10/11 7:58 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
[...]
If the application starts by putting each contact as offline, there
will be no difference between no information known (while waiting a
notify) and offline.
Moreover, no reply to subscribe could be another status: presence error.
So I would say
On 10/06/11 16:07, Daniel-Constantine Mierla wrote:
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
On 10/06/11 12:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 6/10/11 12:04 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer.
Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Eugen Dedu
wrote:
> On 10/06/11 12:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 6/10/11 12:04 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
>>> Thank you very much for your answer.
>>>
>>> Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not been online
>>> since a long time
On 6/10/11 12:27 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
On 10/06/11 12:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 6/10/11 12:04 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer.
Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not been online
since a long time ago, (1) it answers with an empty
On 10/06/11 12:18, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 6/10/11 12:04 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer.
Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not been online
since a long time ago, (1) it answers with an empty body notify (and
not with a body with Offl
Hello,
On 6/10/11 12:04 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer.
Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not been online
since a long time ago, (1) it answers with an empty body notify (and
not with a body with Offline status), and more importantly (2) that
this m
Thank you very much for your answer.
Do you confirm that for kamailio, when a user has not been online since
a long time ago, (1) it answers with an empty body notify (and not with
a body with Offline status), and more importantly (2) that this means
the user is offline?
I ask this because t
Hello,
the notify is sent to inform about the state of the subscription, which
is active in this case. If it would the first subscription to that user
and force_active will not be set, then should be subscription state
pending, iirc.
The empty body does not change anything to the phone infor
No idea?
On 05/06/11 22:31, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
ekiga.net registrar uses kamailio 1.5.3 (yes, a bit old...) and for
users who are not registered an empty NOTIFY body is returned when asked
by a SUBSCRIBE. What does this mean from SIP standard point of view, and
from kamailio point of view (ar
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Southeren [mailto:cr...@southeren.com]
> Sent: Monday, 6 June 2011 7:22 AM
...
> > To resume: What does SIP standard say about this NOTIFY with empty
> > body? Does this mean that the user xyz is offline?
The specification gives no meaning to an empty bo
On 5/06/2011 1:31 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
Hi,
ekiga.net registrar uses kamailio 1.5.3 (yes, a bit old...) and for
users who are not registered an empty NOTIFY body is returned when
asked by a SUBSCRIBE. What does this mean from SIP standard point of
view, and from kamailio point of view (are t
Hi,
ekiga.net registrar uses kamailio 1.5.3 (yes, a bit old...) and for
users who are not registered an empty NOTIFY body is returned when asked
by a SUBSCRIBE. What does this mean from SIP standard point of view,
and from kamailio point of view (are they identical?) I see in
RFC3265/3.1.6.
24 matches
Mail list logo
