Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio no recieved 480/486 messages

2015-07-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, what do you mean by "resend correctly"? -- I don't understand and can help otherwise. Maybe you should look at the sip traffic on the network and send it over here, describing what you expect to happen for each 1/2xx and 4xx. Cheers, Daniel On 01/07/15 10:29, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: > Th

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio no recieved 480/486 messages

2015-07-01 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Thanks for answer. Main problem is that 1[08][03] and 200 replies resend correctly but 480/486 can not do it at same way... ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.o

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio no recieved 480/486 messages

2015-07-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I was not really able to understand the issue you write about ... Anyhow, any sip reply triggers the repply_route or onreply_route[x] that was set for transaction. After those routes are executed, the failure_route[z] can be also executed if the reply code is >=300 and the failure route wa

[SR-Users] Kamailio no recieved 480/486 messages

2015-06-30 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
At my confiig I have route like this onreply_route[REPLY_FROM_WS] { if(status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]") { xlog("L_INFO", "Manage_Reply from webrtc client {$si:$sp} for method {$rm}: $rs"); rtpengine_manage("force trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection DTLS=passive ICE=remove RTP/AVP");