Daniel, thank you.
You are right. NAT pinging from freeswitch side is more preferred in my use
case. And it works pretty well. Thank you once more.
2017-01-03 16:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Tryba :
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:07:20PM +0200, Vladyslav Zakhozhai wrote:
> > Daniel, thank you for your answ
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:07:20PM +0200, Vladyslav Zakhozhai wrote:
> Daniel, thank you for your answer.
>
> You did not understand me completely. This is my fault.
>
> Let me put it this way. I want kamailio to handle NAT (fixing nat only from
> client's side) not being registrar itself. This a
Daniel, thank you for your answer.
You did not understand me completely. This is my fault.
Let me put it this way. I want kamailio to handle NAT (fixing nat only from
client's side) not being registrar itself. This also includes nat pinning.
usrloc module is a dependency for nat pinning in nathel
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 12:58:20PM +0200, Vladyslav Zakhozhai wrote:
> The main question here is about nat pinning. Acctording to module doc (
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/nathelper.html) I need
> nathelper module and usrloc module.
>
> So I can proxy REGISTER requests to frees
Hi,
I want to use Kamailio as SIP loadbalancer and NAT helper in front of
freeswitch boxes. Main tasks here are:
1. load balancing SIP requests to freeswitch boxes
2. fixing contact information during registrations and invites for nat'ed
clients (kamailio is not registrar)
3. fixing sdp (or proxyi
