> Daniel
>
> On 18/03/16 10:05, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> Could someone point me into the right direction for fixing this issue with
> CANCEL replies?
>
> Regards,
>
> Grant
>
> From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
Thank you Olle! I’ll discuss this with our supplier.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Olle
E. Johansson
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 10:16 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in
> On 04 Apr 2016, at 10:02, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You mentioned below about this issue not being complaint with the RFC.
> Our supplier is telling us this is normal behavior and that they went through
> the RFC and found this was normal behavior.
>
> If it’s not too mu
ribed?
Regards,
Grant
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 4:33 PM
To: Grant Bagdasarian ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in reply
Hello,
the problem is that the devic
gt;
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Grant
>
>
>
> *From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Grant Bagdasarian
> *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2016 10:01 AM
> *To:* 'mico...@gmail.com' ; Kamailio (
boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Grant Bagdasarian
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:01 AM
To: 'mico...@gmail.com' ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in reply
Hello Daniel,
Thank you for figuring thi
Bagdasarian <mailto:g...@cm.nl>; Kamailio (SER) - Users
Mailing List
<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in reply
Hello,
with CeBIT trip this week, I didn't get the change to look too much at it...
What is the dev
--
>
> *From:*sr-users <mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>> on behalf of Grant
> Bagdasarian mailto:g...@cm.nl>>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 3:09:47 PM
> *To:* 'mico...@gmail.com'; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
y, March 18, 2016 10:25 AM
> *To:* Grant Bagdasarian ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
> List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found
> in reply
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> with CeBIT trip this week, I didn't get the change to
as a "customer".
Regards,
Grant
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 10:25 AM
To: Grant Bagdasarian ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in reply
Hello,
with CeBIT trip th
; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3.4: receive_msg(): no via found in reply
Any ideas how to solve this?
Regards,
Grant
From: sr-users
mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org>>
on behalf of Grant Bagdasarian m
Y4ODM4YWZlZGFjNTBjMDZmYjQzMzBkOGI.
Contact: .
CSeq: 2 INVITE.
Server: sbc_5.
Content-Length: 0.
.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users]
jMDZmYjQzMzBkOGI.
Contact: .
CSeq: 2 INVITE.
Server: sbc_5.
Content-Length: 0.
.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.3
Hello,
what would be relevant here is seeing the INVITE request sent to
10.14.0.1:5060 -- paste it to the mailing list discussion. That is going
to be used to generate 487, and the Via stack from it should be used there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/16 13:23, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
We're testing kamailio 4.3.4 with two kamailio's communicating with each other.
One of them is a gateway with rtpengine at the carrier side, the other is a
basic sip router.
When calling a destination and cancelling the INVITE a 487 is received from the
carrier and directly ACK'd by the
15 matches
Mail list logo
