Hello Miguel,
I had the time to do some tests and look at the code. The remove_latency
is not what you thought (and I expected the same), but the time after
which to remove an IP from internal tree if no request is received from
it during that duration -- it is this behavior from old ser era.
Hi Daniel,
Here goes the log with debug=4:
Sep 20 16:19:56 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16384]:
DBG:sanity:sanity_check: all sanity checks passed
Sep 20 16:19:56 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16382]:
DBG:core:get_hdr_field: [44]; uri=[sip:myu...@test.com]
Sep 20 16:19
Hello,
can you get a verbose debug log (debug=4)?
Thanks,
Daniel
On 9/10/10 1:58 PM, Miguel Baptista wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running kamailio-1.5.4-tls and I want to enable pike module in it.
I did some test but it isn't working properly. I mean it isn't acting
according to the /remove_latancy/
Hi All,
I'm running kamailio-1.5.4-tls and I want to enable pike module in it.
I did some test but it isn't working properly. I mean it isn't acting
according to the /remove_latancy/ parameter. When an IP address is
blocked (cause it triggered the pike module), it should be blocked for
the amount
