Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-30 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Thanks Alex. Finally i made two kamailio.cfg depending on which case, behind NAT or not, and advertise address to local when no NAT. Will look for a clean solution later Thanks for your attention 2015-07-29 10:25 GMT+02:00 Alex Balashov : > Is it possible you have a default OS 'iptables' con

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
Is it possible you have a default OS 'iptables' configuration that is blocking receipt of the packet by Kamailio at the application layer? Please check/feel free to send the output of: iptables -L -n -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atla

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Yes i made a tcpdump.. as packet is with 172.26.x.x and arrives to 192.168.0.170, seems to discard 08:14:30.154820 IP 172.26.101.10.5080 > 192.168.0.170.8002: UDP, length 456 E...v...@./...e ...B..v.ACK sip:110@PUBLIC IP:5066 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.26.101.10:5080;branch=z9hG4bK6f81

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
On 07/29/2015 04:19 AM, Alberto Sagredo wrote: No. ACK seems to do not arrive to Kamailio The 'tcpdump' filter I gave you won't show you that. It was designed specifically to capture packet flow between Kamailio and the phone. To see whether it arrives at Kamailio, you'll need to liberalise

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
No. ACK seems to do not arrive to Kamailio I will review some things and let you know back. 2015-07-29 9:52 GMT+02:00 Alex Balashov : > If you take a raw capture on the Kamailio box: > >tcpdump -i any -A -s 0 -n udp port 8002 and host PUBLIC_IP > > Does it not show Kamailio attempting to rel

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
If you take a raw capture on the Kamailio box: tcpdump -i any -A -s 0 -n udp port 8002 and host PUBLIC_IP Does it not show Kamailio attempting to relay it there? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Yes Alex. I see ACK sent to 192.168.0.170:8002 from Asterisk as follows: set_destination: Parsing for address/port to send to set_destination: set destination to 192.168.0.170:8002 Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.0.170:8002: ACK sip:1...@public.ip:5066 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.26.101.10

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
On 07/29/2015 03:44 AM, Alberto Sagredo wrote: Could be Kamailio discarding this ACK In anyway? It's possible, but have you made absolute sure that it's not trying to send it to PUBLIC_IP:5066? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Umm Alex I see ACK sent to Kamailio from Asterisk, but not seen it send again. Will take some more traces. and let you know back Could be Kamailio discarding this ACK In anyway? 2015-07-29 9:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Balashov : > Alberto, > > Based on the 200 OK you included, the end-to-end ACK from

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
Alberto, Based on the 200 OK you included, the end-to-end ACK from Asterisk to Kamailio would be expected to go to 192.168.0.170:8002 and to have a request URI of sip:1...@public.ip:5066 This is precisely where Kamailio will try to send the ACK. Does sending it to PUBLIC.IP:5066 not caus

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Hi Alex 1.- Kamailio -> 172.26.101.50:8002 (Floating IP) Asterisk -> 172.26.101.10:5080 2.- Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.0.170:8002: ACK sip:110@IP_PUBLIC_IP:5066 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.26.101.10:5080;branch=z9hG4bK0a330ae6 Route: Max-Forwards: 70 From: "asterisk" ;tag=as14d7523

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
Alberto, 1. What are the literal (natively homed) IP addresses of Asterisk and Kamailio? 2. What is the Request Line (first line) of the ACK request being sent from Asterisk, i.e. ACK sip:... SIP/2.0 3. To what IP and port is the ACK being sent by Asterisk? -- Alex Balashov | Principal

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Hi Alex. Both Kamailio and Asterisk are in same network. Asterisk and Kamailio are behind NAT Im working with record route.. to see if i solve this if (is_method("INVITE") && is_ip_rfc1918("$si")) { record_route_preset("192.168.0.170:8002;nat=no"); xlog("L_INFO", "Source IP

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alex Balashov
Alberto, On 07/28/2015 06:22 AM, Alberto Sagredo wrote: I have seen an issue with ACK as show when Asterisk sends ACK to Kamailio, it sends to advertised Address instead to Kamailio IP address. When you say "advertised address", do you mean the value of the advertised_address core configurat

[SR-Users] Issue with ACK behind NAT

2015-07-29 Thread Alberto Sagredo
I have Kamailio in a local network with RTPPROXY and NAT MANAGE I have seen an issue with ACK as show when Asterisk sends ACK to Kamailio, it sends to advertised Address instead to Kamailio IP address. What could i add to solve this? route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) {