Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-29 Thread Charles Chance
Hi Both, In this case the system was using binaries from opensuse build service, so gcc I believe? Cheers, Charles On 28 Aug 2014 21:25, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > On 28/08/14 20:32, Jason Penton wrote: > > Hey Daniel, > > I am puzzled by how this could make any differen

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-28 Thread Jason Penton
Yeah, would be cool to see what compiler Charles is using. Thanks Daniel On 28 Aug 2014 22:25, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > On 28/08/14 20:32, Jason Penton wrote: > > Hey Daniel, > > I am puzzled by how this could make any difference? Could you explain? > Is this dependent on

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-28 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 28/08/14 20:32, Jason Penton wrote: Hey Daniel, I am puzzled by how this could make any difference? Could you explain? Is this dependent on the compiler used and whether or not void* arithmetic is allowed? void is incomplete type, of no defined data size, you cannot have: void x;

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-28 Thread Jason Penton
Hey Daniel, I am puzzled by how this could make any difference? Could you explain? Is this dependent on the compiler used and whether or not void* arithmetic is allowed? Cheers Jason On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > can you try this small patch? >

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-27 Thread Charles Chance
Hi Daniel, The patch has tested OK so far. Regards, Charles On 22 August 2014 12:37, Charles Chance wrote: > Thanks, Daniel. > > It can be hours, days or weeks between occurrences, but I will report > back after a day or two initially then continue to monitor. > > Cheers, > > Charles > On

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-22 Thread Charles Chance
Thanks, Daniel. It can be hours, days or weeks between occurrences, but I will report back after a day or two initially then continue to monitor. Cheers, Charles On 22 Aug 2014 12:18, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > can you try this small patch? > > diff --git a/modules/pua_d

Re: [SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you try this small patch? diff --git a/modules/pua_dialoginfo/pua_dialoginfo.c b/modules/pua_dialoginfo/pua_dialoginfo.c index 1e88a04..0f02b2b 100644 --- a/modules/pua_dialoginfo/pua_dialoginfo.c +++ b/modules/pua_dialoginfo/pua_dialoginfo.c @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct str_list* get

[SR-Users] Help analysing segmentation fault

2014-08-22 Thread Charles Chance
Hi All, I wonder if some one could help me to diagnose a recurring issue? It happens at random times/intervals and under varying load. But always, just before the time of crash, I see the same critical error in log: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:841]: log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 6 in state