On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya wrote:
> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by
> the number of devices.
>
> When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.
>
> Optimisa
Hello Henning,
My application is slightly different in that I have hundreds of nodes
each running an instance of Kamailio on embedded servers in a failure
tolerant configuration. This is in a risk-of-life application and each
node has large backup power supplies.
In reality kamailio takes milliwa
I should point out that my SIP business is risk-of-life voice services
where I have to arrange to power SIP devices and communications devices
from alternate energy sources for extended periods, so I am intimately
aware of every watt that is used in SIP communications.
My systems use kamailio in e
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Jeremya wrote:
> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by
> the number of devices.
>
> When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.
>
> Optimisation
These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required
for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by
the number of devices.
When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.
Optimisation at the server level is not significant on any scale.
O
Hello,
Jan Janak conducted a very interesting research project regarding energy
efficiency of VoIP systems during 2010, a collaboration between
iptel.org and Columbia University.
The team used the source code from sip-router.org GIT repository from
January 2010, which corresponds to Kamailio
