Great! Thanks Jose!
I will ask Daniel to back-port. Daniel, when you get a chance can you
back-port please? ;)
Cheers
Jason
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:46 PM, José Seabra wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I tested your patch and it is working well.
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards
>
>
> 2014/1/16 Jason Penton
>
Hi Jason,
I tested your patch and it is working well.
Thank you
Regards
2014/1/16 Jason Penton
> Hi Jose,
>
> I've just pushed a patch to master. Please can you test and get back to me.
>
> Cheers
> Jason
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jason Penton > wrote:
>
>> Ok, that makes sens
Hi Jose,
I've just pushed a patch to master. Please can you test and get back to me.
Cheers
Jason
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jason Penton
wrote:
> Ok, that makes sense. I have made a patch. I am just going to do some
> tests to confirm all is okay and then will push to master. If your t
Ok, that makes sense. I have made a patch. I am just going to do some tests
to confirm all is okay and then will push to master. If your tests on
master are successful we will back-port.
Cheers
Jason
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:36 PM, José Seabra wrote:
> Hello Jason,
> Yes i'm using async slee
Hello Jason,
Yes i'm using async sleep function, within my failure route.
Regards
2014/1/16 Jason Penton
> Hi Jose,
>
> Are you using any async functions in your config file? Or is this just
> standard failure route handling?
>
> Cheers
> Jason
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:28 PM, José Seab
Hi Jose,
Are you using any async functions in your config file? Or is this just
standard failure route handling?
Cheers
Jason
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:28 PM, José Seabra wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Please check the attachment.
>
> The calls is started for number 3001 from number 2...@admin.c
