Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

On 3/26/13 7:36 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Thanks Daniel, that's what I'm thinking (dmq). Welcome! Not sure it would help anyhow, but htable should have support for dmq replication -- quick source code reveals that, although the readme of htable does not have any related note. Cheers, Danie

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Thanks Daniel, that's what I'm thinking (dmq). I'll let you know how I get on! Cheers, Charles On Mar 26, 2013 4:40 PM, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > On 3/26/13 5:30 PM, Charles Chance wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Yes, dmq is the clear way forward once it's working. Is it a l

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Hello, On 3/26/13 5:30 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi Daniel, Yes, dmq is the clear way forward once it's working. Is it a lot of work to get going again? For it to be really useful, I would imagine other modules will need to make use of it from within their code, rather than the user trying t

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Hi Daniel, Yes, dmq is the clear way forward once it's working. Is it a lot of work to get going again? For it to be really useful, I would imagine other modules will need to make use of it from within their code, rather than the user trying to do stuff in the config. I may take a look and see how

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Hello, On 3/26/13 1:51 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi all, I was wondering, how are others sharing dialog module (particularly profile) state between multiple servers? if it is just about counting the active dialog calls per user/ip/etc ... so far I am mainly using htable, with notifications

[SR-Users] Dialog module - shared state

Hi all, I was wondering, how are others sharing dialog module (particularly profile) state between multiple servers? Thanks in advance, Charles -- www.sipcentric.com Follow us on twitter @sipcentric Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 736