Re: [SR-Users] Configuring Kamailio as a "VoIP traffic reflector"

2017-03-31 Thread Tahiro Hashizume
> Even simpler, didn't think of just sending to differenct ipadresses. So > just set the forced ip to sip:$Ri:$Rp. If you use $fs instead of the old > force_send_socket() it is as simple as: $fs="sip:$Ri:$Rp". Well, that and also the SIP-URI as the potential identifier, I thought. Which is neater?

Re: [SR-Users] Configuring Kamailio as a "VoIP traffic reflector"

2017-03-31 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:15:58PM +0900, Tahiro Hashizume wrote: > > The hard part is how you will differentiate the REGISTERS from asterisk > > to the sipserver. > The imaginary solution to this in my head is telling Kamailio to > listen to 10.1.1.1N:5061 (N=0-4) on dummyN as well, to which Aster

Re: [SR-Users] Configuring Kamailio as a "VoIP traffic reflector"

2017-03-30 Thread Tahiro Hashizume
To all and Daniel > have you tried 1 ipaddress and different source ports? I have not tried it myself, however folks here having the same issue have tried using both "chan_sip" and "pjsip" working on different ports of the same machine (both under control of a single Asterisk instance) and report

Re: [SR-Users] Configuring Kamailio as a "VoIP traffic reflector"

2017-03-30 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:57:02PM +0900, Tahiro Hashizume wrote: > B.)Kamailio listens on five IP addresses on dummyN which has > 10.1.1.1N/32 (N=0-4, so dummy0 has 10.1.1.10/32, for example) making > five SIP+RTP sessions to the same remote host to appear as if they are > from five different host

[SR-Users] Configuring Kamailio as a "VoIP traffic reflector"

2017-03-29 Thread Tahiro Hashizume
Hi there, This e-mail is going to be lengthy and I hope you will not get frustrated (like I am, for different reasons described later) by reading it all from the beginning to the end since I have just warned you :P You have absolutely no need for reading the entire post unless you are crazy enough