>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Tryba
> Sent: 24 August 2016 17:46
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Checking if a reply is part of a forked transaction
>
>
On woensdag 24 augustus 2016 20:03:57 CEST Phil Lavin wrote:
> We're already doing some logic before forking and we considered tracking
> call IDs in a hash table... but your idea sounds interesting (better). I
> wonder if we can add a parameter to one of the headers in the request. Will
> explore
m: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel Tryba
Sent: 24 August 2016 17:46
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Checking if a reply is part of a forked transaction
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:36:16PM +, Phil Lavin wrote:
> We
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:36:16PM +, Phil Lavin wrote:
> We need to check if a 1XX reply is part of an INVITE transaction that
> was forked to 2 or more phones. We figure that we can do a location
> lookup, based on the to header of the 1XX... but is there a better
> way?
It looks like can te
We need to check if a 1XX reply is part of an INVITE transaction that was
forked to 2 or more phones. We figure that we can do a location lookup, based
on the to header of the 1XX... but is there a better way?
Phil
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kam
