Re: [SR-Users] Branch feedback behaviour

2014-06-08 Thread Alex Balashov
Thanks, that's what I ended up doing. And yeah, it's the same kind of use case. On 8 June 2014 18:32:56 GMT-04:00, Brandon Armstead wrote: >Alex, > > I am not sure of your use case - but one common example I can think of >is a LRN service provided via 302 redirect. What we do in this >instance

Re: [SR-Users] Branch feedback behaviour

2014-06-08 Thread Brandon Armstead
Alex, I am not sure of your use case - but one common example I can think of is a LRN service provided via 302 redirect. What we do in this instance is UAC -> Kamailio on this initial transaction we send the call directly to the LRN service (not appending) any other branches and alter the orig

Re: [SR-Users] Branch feedback behaviour

2014-06-08 Thread Alex Balashov
Sounds like t_drop_replies() might be the ticket, but I wanted to check with the Best Practices Council. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/ Please be kind to the English language: http://www.entr

[SR-Users] Branch feedback behaviour

2014-06-08 Thread Alex Balashov
Hello, I've got a situation like this: UAC ---> (Kamailio) --> 1. redirect server on branch 1 <-- 2. 302 redirect --> 3. ACK > UAC B Problem is, if CANCEL comes in at the exact