Re: [SR-Users] Basic TM suspend question

2016-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 21/10/16 11:26, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 10/21/2016 05:22 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Also the timeout runs for it and failure_route can be executed in >> that case. > > Interesting. That brings up two more questions: > > 1. If fr_timer is set to 3000 but I suspend the transactio

Re: [SR-Users] Basic TM suspend question

2016-10-21 Thread Alex Balashov
On 10/21/2016 05:22 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Also the timeout runs for it and failure_route can be executed in that case. Interesting. That brings up two more questions: 1. If fr_timer is set to 3000 but I suspend the transaction for 4 seconds, does that mean that failure_route is

Re: [SR-Users] Basic TM suspend question

2016-10-21 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 20/10/16 21:51, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi, > > If a transaction is currently t_suspended() and has not been > t_continued(), will t_check_trans() still find that transaction for > retransmission-dampening purposes, e.g. if a retransmission of the > same request as the original one is re

[SR-Users] Basic TM suspend question

2016-10-20 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi, If a transaction is currently t_suspended() and has not been t_continued(), will t_check_trans() still find that transaction for retransmission-dampening purposes, e.g. if a retransmission of the same request as the original one is received? Thanks, -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evaris