Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

2016-02-12 Thread Phil Lavin
2 February 2016 18:53 To: mico...@gmail.com; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains To follow up on this, using a common domain across all watchers and UAs has resolved the issue - thanks for the hint. I'm now looking to implement TLS suppo

Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

2016-02-12 Thread Phil Lavin
users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: 19 January 2016 23:16 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains Hello, the domain part of the uri matters in matching the sip addresses. You should use a commo

Re: [SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

2016-01-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the domain part of the uri matters in matching the sip addresses. You should use a common hostname instead of IP addresses in such case, if you want to have same presentity. Even if you do it in kamailio somehow for many IPs, the watchers won't consider those to which they haven't subscri

[SR-Users] BLF on different IPs/domains

2016-01-19 Thread Phil Lavin
Hi all, A different BLF query to my other one so creating another thread. We've tried to have a BLF client SUBSCRIBE using a secondary IP on Kamailio. It is not sent a NOTIFY, but a client which has done a SUBSCRIBE using the primary IP is. If we route the problematic client such that it connec