Re: [SR-Users] Authentication on loose_route();

2012-03-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
From experiences of the past cases, it can be indeed problematic with some client. But can be done as Alex said. I just wanted to add a bit about how I preferred to do it when I had to. I try to auth only caller always, as it was for initial INVITE. The way to do it is to append from tag to re

Re: [SR-Users] Authentication on loose_route();

2012-03-23 Thread Alex Balashov
Clearly, you can only authenticate sequential requests corresponding to calls whose initial requests were subject to authentication. If the initial request was not authenticated, there is no reason to believe that the endpoint would support authentication of sequential requests. As to whether y

[SR-Users] Authentication on loose_route();

2012-03-23 Thread David
Hello, Should I be requiring users to authenticate before letting them into loose_route(); ? What about anonymous calls from E164, how do I authenticate these calls after they have started? Thanks, David ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamai