On Friday 31 January 2014 11:28:54 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Are you sure there is no other set for failure route before getting to
> route[RELAY]? Inside it, there is an IF for setting the failure route.
Shame on me, I'm using the dispatcher module and since route[DISPATCHER] ends
with:
Are you sure there is no other set for failure route before getting to
route[RELAY]? Inside it, there is an IF for setting the failure route.
If not set in other place, I can check the code once I get a chance, but
I don't remember any filtering out 401. Maybe you can give a quick try
without
On Friday 31 January 2014 06:17:35 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> > But to my suprise the 401 doesn't end up in the failure_route but in the
> > onreply_route. Why? What am I missing?
>
> if you don't drop it in the onreply route, then you should have the
> failure route executed as well. Also
Hello,
On 30/01/14 18:33, Daniel Tryba wrote:
Situation:
endpoint -> kamailio (4.1.0) -> upstream sip server (kamailio 4.0.x)
For an outbound call endpoint authenticates with kamailio. Kamailio relays the
invite to upstream and upstream responds with a 401.
This 401 should trigger authenticati
Situation:
endpoint -> kamailio (4.1.0) -> upstream sip server (kamailio 4.0.x)
For an outbound call endpoint authenticates with kamailio. Kamailio relays the
invite to upstream and upstream responds with a 401.
This 401 should trigger authentication. So I thought I could use uac_auth() to
fix
